<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<doi>/ISEC.res.2017.4</doi>
<title-group>
<article-title>RISK ALLOCATION MECHANISM FOR BUILDING<br/>
PROJECTS BASED ON THE RIBA PLAN OF WORK</article-title>
</title-group>

<author>CHIPOZYA TEMBO and NTHATISI KHATLELI</author>

<aff>School of Construction Economics and Management, University of Witwatersrand,<br/>
Johannesburg, South Africa</aff>


</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>The Zambian construction industry, like many other construction industries in
developing countries, is characterized with frequent project failure evidenced by
quality shortfalls, cost overruns, time overruns and, on occasion, abandonment of
projects. Various construction industries, particularly developed ones, have
mechanisms in place to alleviate the aforementioned risks. Moreover, it has been
reported that construction organizations in developing countries, approach risk
management implied risk allocation in construction projects by using a set of practices
that are normally insufficient, often produce poor results, and limit the success of
project outcome. It is from this background that a risk allocation mechanism tailored to
the Zambian building sector is proposed, based on the RIBA plan of work for new large
to medium sized projects. Various mechanisms and processes are documented in the
existing literature, all developed for particular jurisdictions, project types and modes of
procurement. Though beneficial, the crafting of most of these mechanisms does not
focus on curtailing sources of inappropriate risk allocation, but rather focuses on who,
between the client and contractor, should be allocated a particular risk. This paper
documents a mechanism for risk allocation after establishing the causes of risk
misallocation through a questionnaire survey, interviews, and document analysis. The
mechanism integrates contract practice and risk management to make it robust for
alleviating both contractual and non-contractual risks. However, its utility, to an
extent, is dependent on the risk perceptions of the user as it is driven by decision-making.</p>
<p><italic>Keywords: </italic>Zambia, Risk management, Causal factors, Framework.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>AAE-19</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>
