<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<doi>/ISEC.res.2017.47</doi>
<title-group>
<article-title>USING EYE MOVEMENTS TO IDENTIFY<br/>
HAZARDS MISSED BY AT-RISK WORKERS</article-title>
</title-group>

<author>SOGAND HASANZADEH<sup>1</sup>, BEHZAD ESMAEILI<sup>1</sup>, MICHEL D. DODD<sup>2</sup>,<br/>
and EUGENIO PELLICER<sup>3</sup></author>

<aff><sup>1</sup>Durham School of Architectural Engineering and Construction, University of Nebraska–<br/>
Lincoln, Lincoln, USA<br/>
<sup>2</sup>
Dept of Psychology, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, USA<br/>
<sup>3</sup>School of Civil Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain</aff>


</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>Identifying hazardous situations is a complex and multidimensional cognitive process
that requires the proper allocation of workers’ attention. Eye-tracking technologies
provide a viable option for studying construction workers’ attentional allocation and for
linking attention to their hazard-identification capabilities. The objective of the study
is to use eye-movement measures to determine which types of hazards construction
workers miss, ignore, or perceive to be insignificant. In order to achieve this goal, 31
construction workers participated in a controlled laboratory experiment in which they
searched for hazards in images of 35 real construction-site scenarios while a head-mounted EyeLink II tracked their eye movements. The results showed differences in
the participants’ attentional distributions and that the hazard identification of workers
with low and high hazard-identification skills stems from the types of hazard—not the
number of hazards—within the scenarios. Further investigation on five images
revealed that at-risk workers dwelt on imminent danger (e.g., workers in dangerous
areas) rather than spreading their attentional efforts searching for sources of non-obvious hazards, including electrical hazards, housekeeping hazards and fall-protection-system-related hazards. The results of this experiment can thus support
personalized safety training that targets at-risk workers.</p>
<p><italic>Keywords: </italic> Hazard identification, Construction safety, Safety training, Eye-tracking, 
Visual attention.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>CS-9</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>