<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<doi>/ISEC.res.2017.52</doi>
<title-group>
<article-title>FROM PROTEGE TO CUSTOMER: INCREASING<br/>
STUDENT INFLUENCE IN CIVIL AND<br/>
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION</article-title>
</title-group>

<author>ULRIKE QUAPP and KLAUS HOLSCHEMACHER</author>

<aff>Faculty of Civil Engineering, Leipzig University of Applied Sciences, Leipzig, Germany</aff>


</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>The increasing appearance of fee financed education offers in higher education result in
a power shift from higher education institutions in Germany to their students. Thus, for
example, students claim more involvement in university decision processes and the
right to evaluate lecturers’ teaching skills. This paper is dealing with the development
of student rights. It describes the students’ position at universities under higher
education policy aspects. A closer look on the rights and duties of students gives an
idea of their options to influence civil and structural engineering education.
Furthermore, advantages and disadvantages of the increasing influence of students on
universities’ decision making processes were examined. That issue is especially
discussed under the perspective of the influence on civil and structural engineering
education. The conclusion is that an increasing influence of students and customer
orientation at universities may influence the working atmosphere at higher education
institutions both in a positive as well as in a negative way. Sometimes students have
inventive ideas but often they are not able to overview all aspects of university life.
Universities must master the balance between the educational standards of a higher
education institution and the increasing demands to involve students in institutional
decision making processes.</p>
<p><italic>Keywords: </italic>Student rights, University management, Power shift, Higher education law,
Curricula development, Educational standards, University strategy.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>EPE-14</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>