<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<doi>/ISEC.res.2017.62</doi>
<title-group>
<article-title>ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL COMPRESSION INDEX<br/>
EQUATIONS USING THE WATER CONTENT</article-title>
</title-group>

<author>AMIR W. AL-KHAFAJI, KRISHNANAND Y. MAILLACHERUVU,<br/>
and MELISSA HOERBER</author>

<aff>Dept of Civil Engineering and Construction, Bradley University, Peoria, USA</aff>


</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>This paper proposes a new method to evaluate the reliability of published empirical
formulas in terms of accuracy and applicability to different soil types. Different
empirical models are proposed to properly approximate the compression index for a
wide range of water contents and soil types. They were developed using a unique
technique and a substantial number of published regression equations and compression
data. Familiar empirical equations were examined for their reliability in predicting the
compression index of clay for any water content. A comparison was made between
available and newly-proposed empirical formulas using combined regression data sets
compiled independently by several authors. The newly proposed empirical
compression index equations are applicable to a wide range of clay soils, and in
validating other published relationships. The degree of scatter and variations in the
computed compression index values are minimized for any water content.</p>
<p><italic>Keywords: </italic>Compression data, Regression equations, Empirical equations,
Compression index of clay, Technique.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>GFE-13</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>