<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<doi>/ISEC.res.2017.63</doi>
<title-group>
<article-title>ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL COMPRESSION INDEX<br/>
EQUATIONS USING THE VOID RATIO</article-title>
</title-group>

<author>AMIR AL-KHAFAJI, KRISHNANAND MAILLACHERUVU, and ROBERT JACOBS</author>

<aff>Dept of Civil Engineering and Construction, Bradley University, Peoria, USA</aff>


</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>A new technique to assess the reliability of published compression index equations in
terms of soil void ratio is presented. Several published equations pertaining to different
soil types are examined in terms of accuracy and applicability. The new technique
employs regression analysis to examine a substantial number of published compression
data objectively. The traditional bias inherent in the selection of the number of data
points and the range of void ratios for a given regression equation is eliminated. This
was made possible by creating ranges for the compression index irrespective of the data
set involved. This technique revealed that a strong correlation exists between the
slopes and intercepts of all published equations. The slopes and intercepts of the newly
developed regression equations were used to compare several well know published
equations to assess accuracy and applicability. The proposed technique permits the
examination of the authenticity of any published empirical equations relating to the
compression index of clay to void ratio.</p>
<p><italic>Keywords: </italic>Consolidation, Regression equations, Reliability, Standard error, Clay,
Settlement calculations.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>GFE-14</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>