<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<doi>/ISEC.res.2017.137</doi>
<title-group>
<article-title>CRITICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO<br/>
STRENGTHENING TECHNIQUES OF<br/>
REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS</article-title>
</title-group>

<author>ROSARIO MONTUORI</author>

<aff>Dept of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy</aff>


</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>In last years, in order to better understand the behavior of confined reinforced concrete,
a lot of studies have been made. In addition, also a lot of experimental test have been
conducted. In particular the attention has been devoted to the columns strengthened
with FRP, while other old techniques have been completely forgotten. Herein a
comparison between different methodologies for the strengthening of concrete columns
is presented. In addition to columns confined with FRP the concrete confined with
angles and battens is considered. The comparing between these two methodologies
shows that some advantages arise when battens and angles are used. In fact, they can
be effectively used, also when the ratio between the two sides of the column section is
greater than 2, by means of steel bar passing through the section. In such a case the
confining action due to FRP is negligible. In addition, angles can provide
strengthening both in tension and in compression, depending on the structural detail
adopted at the concrete floor slab.</p>
<p><italic>Keywords: </italic>Angles and battens, FRP, SFRC, Confined concrete, Column repair.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>St-109</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>