<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<doi>/ISEC.res.2017.154</doi>
<title-group>
<article-title>RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BATTENED BUILT-UP<br/>
COLUMNS AND FRAMES ABOUT BUCKLING &#8211;<br/>
BUCKLING STRENGTH BY BLEICH</article-title>
</title-group>

<author>GANG CUI<sup>1</sup>
, MASAE KIDO<sup>1</sup>
, KEIGO TSUDA<sup>1</sup>
, and HIDEYUKI NAKANO<sup>2</sup></author>

<aff><sup>1</sup>Dept of Architechture, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu, Japan<br/>
<sup>2</sup>Building Products Technical Sect., Nippon Steel &amp; Sumikin Metal Products Co., Ltd.,<br/>
Tokyo, Japan</aff>


</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between battened built-up
columns and frames about buckling. The buckling strengths, buckling modes and
bending moment of one bay - <italic>n</italic> stories frame with rigid beams are calculated by the
energy method. The results are compared with those of obtained by the Bleich's
formula and correct solutions. Although the buckling strengths by Bleich agree fairly
well with the correct values, it is shown that the strengths obtained by Bleich formula
are neither the upper bound nor the lower bound. And buckling strengths calculated by
the energy method estimate the correct strength within 5% error when the value of
stories <italic>n</italic> is more than 2. Moreover, Bleich's moment distributions correspond to those
of obtained by the energy method.</p>
<p><italic>Keywords: </italic>Built-up compression member, Flexural buckling, Energy method,
Buckling equation, Moment distribution, Bleich's formula.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>St-25</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>