<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<doi>/ISEC.res.2017.177</doi>
<title-group>
<article-title>STUDY OF CRITERIA USED TO OBTAIN A<br/>
SUSTAINABLE BRIDGE</article-title>
</title-group>

<author>VICENT PENADÉS, VÍCTOR YEPES, TATIANA GARCÍA-SEGURA,<br/>
and JOSÉ-VICENTE MARTÍ</author>

<aff>Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Hormigón (ICITECH),<br/>
Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain</aff>


</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>The sustainable development of bridges is mainly based on meeting the three pillars of
sustainability (economic, social and environmental factors) which have different goals.
Each main criterion groups a large number of subcritera. Therefore, achieve a
sustainable bridge is a complicate problem that involves a high number of factors in
each stage of bridge life-cycle. For this reason, decision-making is a helpful process to
solve the sustainability problem. The objective of this work is to review the bridge
life-cycle decision-making problems that involve criteria that represent the pillars of
the sustainability. While some works only consider criteria related to one or two of
these pillars, the most current works consider criteria that involve all the pillars of
sustainability. Furthermore, most of the works reviewed only study one stage of bridge
life-cycle. This study shows the criteria used in some revised journal articles in each
bridge life-cycle phase and, the multi-attribute decision-making used to achieve the
sustainability. In addition, a small explanation of the obtained information will be
carried out.</p>
<p><italic>Keywords: </italic>Multi-criteria, Life-cycle, Decision-making, MCDM, MADM.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>St-37</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>