This paper reviews the approach of eleven national codes on the analysis and design of masonry-infilled frames. It is shown that, in general, codes can be divided into two groups. The first group isolates the masonry and frame members by providing gaps to minimize the interaction between them. This method ensures that the complexities involved in analyzing the structure is avoided. However, the width of the gaps recommended is different for each of the codes. The second group takes advantage of the presence of high stiffness and strength masonry infill. In this technique, an equivalent-strut modeling strategy is mostly recommended. It is shown that the strut model suggested in each of the codes is different. An attempt to obtain a generic model for masonry-infilled frame failed largely due to the existence of many behavior-influencing parameters. Finally, it is suggested to have a paradigm shift in the modeling strategy where the masonry-infilled frames are classified into different categories and a model is suggested for each of them.
Full Text (PDF)